Robert Schuller And Billy Graham Speaking Wide Acceptance

April 27th, 2010

This video has created a firestorm for the less intelligent Christians. Many begin this video saying Billy Graham has become senile because he believes God will accept the Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists etc. But the real truth is, is that God is not sectarian and doesn’t see with Religious bigotry like many so called Christian zealots have. Hats off to Dr. Robert Schuller and Billy Graham. They see with great vision.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

14 Responses to “Robert Schuller And Billy Graham Speaking Wide Acceptance”

  • i love this video if everyone in the world saw this i think it would bring a better understanding of god and bring us as a communety of humans closer to going back home to godhead

    hare krsna supreme personality of godhead

  • This two “fantastic” men are false prophets and perverted teachers. They driftet off of the narrow way of the real Jesus. No, no one of them will go to heaven … I am sorry, this says the Bible. Read this book and meditate every moment in his verses of truth. God bless you.

  • This is a frequently copied video, but the premise is false. It takes 60secs of a roughly 10min interview and totally lifts it from context. In fact, the interview talks about the need for repentence and turning to Christ. This specific excerpt was about those precluded from hearing the Gospel through no fault of their own. Graham goes on to state that to those who have not heard the Gospel, God alone knows their hearts.

  • This is taken out of context. Sure, Mr. Graham could have worded some things better…..but this little excerpt is misleading.

  • This is a Sham, come on the voice and the lips are not in sync in the most crucial places. Billy Graham has never said anything so contradictory to what he has given his entire life for.

  • Well If you think I am not telling the truth , look to the right, where it says related videos: (see that) I counted at least four versions of this video and another with Larry King Live where he says the same thing.

  • He’s simply saying that Jesus uses people who don’t even know who he is or has a personal relationship with him. Just b/c people believe in something else doesn’t change the fact that are a creation of the one true Christ and are loved unconditionally by him.

  • You people can either go into denial and put it on display for all of us to see, or you can just accept fact and realize that you have just witnessed the most famous preacher of our generation commit the worst heresy possible. You choose, but I won’t go into denial for any reason, including my feelings.

  • No, he’s saying people can/will be saved without knowing the name of Jesus, which is complete heresy!!

  • Humans such as who make up congregations that go along with any invented belief, such as the god concept or the heaven and hell concept, where there is absolutley no evidence are inheritently immoral, fearful and corrupt and deserve to live their one life as a slave in an alternate world made up completely of lies.

  • Where can I find Robert Schulers sermon?

  • Are you emplying everyone on this earth has been evangelized to and has been told about Jesus? If you are you’re factually incorrect. Rev. Graham was pointing to the fact that even though one hasn’t been told about Jesus and doesn’t know his name they still know that there is something greater and they want to be apart of what that greater power is. Their faith in that greater power will save them even though they don’t know the name of Jesus.

  • Sorry but scripture says differently.
    Acts 4:12 And there is salvation in no other One; for there is no other name under Heaven given among men by which we must be saved.

    Either Christ is the way, the truth and the life or He isn’t. You can’t have it both ways as Mr Graham implies.

  • They said what they said, I am suspending comments from this video because people are saying: “he said this; but he meant that”. Folks these are lifetime broadcasters, they know the meanings of words and their impact. There is no need to change the meaning of what they said by interpretation.

Trackback URI Comments RSS

Leave a Reply

This site uses KeywordLuv. Enter YourName@YourKeywords in the Name field to take advantage.

 
Powered by Yahoo! Answers